Russian residents petition president for rethink on migration law


Some of the hundreds of Russian citizens who have actually made Latvia the home of leave the Putin program in their homeland are advising President Raimonds Vejonis to put the brakes on changes to the migration law that would see them asked to pay thousands of euros to renew their residency permits, Russian-language channel LTV7 reported Monday.


In order to renew their 5-year Latvian home permits, Russian people (and others from non-EU nations) will have to pay a 5,000 charge per family member.

The new laws were passed by the Latvian parliament recently.

Now a group of Russian citizens affected by the changes have written a letter to President Raimonds Vejonis arguing that they resettled in Latvia because of its flexibilities, now stand to be punished or potentially driven somewhere else if they cannot manage the new charges.

Among the signatories is Natalia Poberezhska, reports LSM’s Russian language service, who said she picked Latvia for its democracy. She has sold an apartment in Russia in order to buy one in Riga, getting a so-called “investor visa” as a result. The brand-new modifications came as a nasty surprise, she stated, particularly as the law is retrospective, impacting all who got house licenses from 2011.

In my opinion, retroactive laws should not occur in democratic countries. I would like to comprehend why this is taking place,” said Poberezhska.



The 23rd article of the law on residence licenses is supplemented by a new paragraph which says candidates are required making a payment of 5,000 euros to the state budget plan.


A deputy from the National Alliance, Karlis Kreslins not only supported the modification, however said he might have provided his own family with a brand-new household expense in the process.

“My wife is a Russian resident, she has a short-lived residence authorization,” said Kreslins.

Riga has become a magnet for members of the Russian intelligentsia, and particularly journalists working for independent Russian media such as Meduza and Spektr, both which have made the Kremlin’s disfavor.

Denis Sergeyev is among a group of 10 previous Muscovites, who resided in Latvia and have signed the letter to the president of Latvia to return the change to the Saeima for revision rather than promulgating it into law.

“We really want to think that the law will not be used retroactively, as in all civilized Europe,” said Sergeyev.


Journalist Leonid Ragozin has likewise harshly slammed the brand-new law, stating that it specifically targets middle-class Russians and political dissidents while leaving the oligarchs and rich business owners who have likewise gained from Latvia’s home permit scheme completely unaffected.

Ragozin makes his case against the brand-new law in this blog post and just recently appeared on Ukrainian news channel Hromadske (in English) to discuss it (below). The section on Latvia begins 8 minutes in. From assets to alimony, child custody to child support, our tampa divorce lawyers have you covered.

Brexit: Work and Migration Law ramifications

With the main EU referendum project duration underway, Brexit – an abbreviation for Britain’s exit from the EU – is leading of the political and business program.

The referendum on whether the UK need to remain in the European Union is to be hung on Thursday 23 June 2016. The question presented is, “Should the United Kingdom stay a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?” If the vote is to leave, the UK should provide 2 years’ notification, meaning an official exit would not happen till 2018 at the earliest.

Work law

Some locations of UK employment law – such as the National Minimum Wage and the law associating with (unreasonable) termination – are outside the scope of EU law and regulated by UK legislation. However, other areas – including unlawful discrimination, specific family-friendly rights, working time, collective redundancy examination and business transfers – have actually been heavily affected by the EU, frequently having a basis in European Directives or case law It is likewise important to note, although that the EU supplies a legal standard, in numerous circumstances the UK offers defense in excess of the EU minimum requirement.


The impact of a Brexit on UK employment law will depend, to a huge level, on how a Brexit would be executed and what, if any, other contracts are put in location as a replacement. If the UK followed the Norwegian model and joined the EEA, the UK would still be subject to a lot of aspects of European employment law. The Swiss model, including access to the single market and many bilateral contracts, might also restrict the sovereignty of employment law due to the need to satisfy trading partners.

If the UK sought a bespoke relationship, theoretically, significant changes could be made. The government would have liberty to leave from EU employment law by reversing and modifying legislation and the UK courts would not be bound by the choices of the ECJ.

Migration law.

The complimentary motion of people is among the 4 economic flexibilities of the EU.

In theory, upon a Brexit, EU people would no longer have the automated right to reside and operate in the UK, and vice versa unless they had actually already acquired irreversible residency. In truth, however, freedom of movement is likely to be an integral part of the negotiations around the post-Brexit relationship between the UK and EU. As is the case with work law, the level of modification to migration law will depend on what this relationship involves. If the UK were to sign up with the EEA, the existing rules would largely remain the very same, whereas alternative models hold more unpredictability. It is anticipated, however, that the federal government would honor existing residence rights for EU citizens residing in the UK (or at least put in place transitional arrangements) in return for the very same treatment for UK people living in other member states. Feel free to contact immigration attorney atlanta for best advice on immigration law.

How would a Brexit legitimately impact employers?

Many EU employment laws have become established in the UK’s legal and ideological framework, indicating the UK federal government is likely to be disinclined to make drastic changes at least in the short-term. Laws that are considered to enforce the biggest burden on companies – such as company worker rights, cumulative consultation and working time rights – are most likely to be subject to change.

The position on immigration is less clear. Labor lacks, a loss of talent and movement constraints are all methods which businesses could be impacted depending on how the federal government chooses to control or remove European nationals right to live and work in the UK.

A short-term concern is that businesses will be less likely to purchase the UK up until there is clearness on what a Brexit truly requires.

  • Practical steps to take ahead of the EU referendum on 23 June
  • Communicate with employees where affected or concerned
  • Audit your labor force in regards to where they work and their migration status
  • Review employment contracts and policies
  • Identify the result, if any, on advantage schemes
  • Check your European Works Council plan; for instance, information/consultation commitments that could arise from restructuring propositions following a Brexit
  • Reconsider pending expatriate arrangements and address any migration applications that might be made now
  • Contingency preparation for a Brexit
  • Consider adjusting contracts to deal with any unenforceability dangers that could occur from a Brexit
  • Reassess pending expatriate plans and resolve any immigration applications that could be made now
  • Consider adapting agreements to attend to any unenforceability risks that might develop from a Brexit

Action Line’s Law Week: Immigration law

This week is Action Line’s Law Week. The Young Lawyers Division of the Hawaii State Bar Association sponsors the Action Line program.


You can call Action Line to receive totally free legal details from practicing Hawaii lawyers. The number to call in between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. is -LRB-808-RRB- 591-0222.


Attorneys cannot offer legal advice, such as suggestions on what to do, but will supply legal information that includes recommendations to resources or explanations of certain legal processes, such as court treatments.


immigration_lawThe Action Line subjects are themed by day. Thursday s topic is immigration law. Lawyer John Robert Egan discusses what that encompasses: We help households and businesses work through the visa process when they are trying to bring somebody to the United States to remain. Often it’s a family member, typically a hubby or partner born overseas; often it’s a local company who needs to fill a key position with a foreign national.


He states his firm sees more family-based migration here in Hawaii, however does some visas for companies too; for instance, if investors wish to open a Japanese dining establishment, and they want to keep it authentic, they may have to bring in a chef from Japan.


Egan says there are huge differences in between immigration patterns in Hawaii compared to the remainder of the United States. Since the majority of our work is with family-based migration, we handle local families, numerous who are sponsoring immigrants from Asia and the Pacific. Where immigration to the Mainland is greatly from Latin America, Europe and Africa, Hawaii’s immigrants come primarily from the Philippines, Japan, Korea and the Pacific Islands.


He says Hawaii doesn’t experience the exact same kind of undocumented immigration concerns the mainland sees. Some migrants to Hawaii have remained on longer than they should, overstayed, however the scale of the unlawful immigration problem in Hawaii is much smaller than on the mainland.


To get information about immigration, Egan states the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service has a total website, and a well-respected Community Outreach program at its Honolulu Field Office. He also advises the Hawaii Immigrant Justice Center, the Pacific Gateway Center and Catholic Charities.


What individuals must know is that there are also some bad places to choose information, such as the scam websites online, unapproved immigration specialists, and the rumor mill. Migration law is made complex and modifications rapidly; put on t be a victim of bad details! Go to a reputable source, Egan reminds.


The Action Line topic Friday is Landlord/Tenant Law.